Featured Posts

Leweb 10 I was at the office this week and had the opportunity to watch a big part of the Leweb 10 conference program, which was streamed online. It must be said, Leweb just rocks, offering everyone to join the...

Read more

Acceptation of the LMS by the secondary school teacher After 2 years of collecting data, I finally got to a more exciting point in my PhD: analyzing the data and publishing the results. In my first study, we search for reasons behind the technology acceptation...

Read more

Hooray, a new MOOC is born: #PLENK2010 I started this blog almost a year ago, when I followed my first MOOC (Massive Open Online Course): CCK09. From this week on a new MOOC, PLENK 2010, will be facilitated by George Siemens, Stephen Downes,...

Read more

Twitter & learners: love or hate?

Posted by Smetty | Posted in CCK09, Presentation | Posted on 21-12-2009

Tags: ,

0

I decided to give 2 presentations on connectivism, to finish up my CCK09 course. The first opportunity took place last weekend @Barcamp 3 Ghent. The presentation can be found on Slideshare.

My presentation starts with some observations out of my own classroom. I ask my own students every year (pre service teachers, professional bachelors, 3-years of study) if they think they can learn from and with others via Twitter, weblogs, podcasts, Facebook etc. And every year, I get the same type of answers for all the applications I mention, except for Facebook. I took Twitter as an example here, but it could be replaced with blogs or podcasts or…

My mid-years always respond with “Twitter is trivial, there is nothing to learn from the update of a celeb telling how they are doing”. My last-years don’t use Twitter, but they start to reflect on ways how Twitter can be used for learning. They start seeing the value of a network as well. And here comes the funny thing: once those students are graduated, they start following paid courses about the applications mentioned above.

The exception is Facebook. They don’t see Facebook as a learning and networking tool, but they do use it that way.

I always tell them during my lessons: please listen to me now, while it is a part of your curriculum, in two years you will have to pay someone to learn the same in a seperate course. But it doesn’t really help.

So what changes in their perception of a tool in those 2 years? A first simple answer can be found in their age. They are two years older after graduation. A second answer will be the difference of being a pre-service teacher and an in-service teacher. I think we can assume that your network starts to grow once you are out of school. So it looks like an in-service teacher starts to use other tools than Facebook to build his/her network. And last but not least, I think our students underestimate the value of learning via a (diverse) network and the importance of building that network.

Since I started talking about learning via networks (5, 6 years) my students’ reactions stayed the same. Will this ever change?

Note: I don’t have proof for all this. It is just my observation of the day.

Write a comment