Featured Posts

TEDx New York on Education On the 6th of march 2010, a very interesting TEDx took place in New York on: 'the role of new media and technology in shaping the future of education'. The event was streamed live, but unfortunately, I...

Read more

Podcast 1 (part 2): my PLE and the influence of the... This podcast (part 2) was recorded as my final project for the CCK09 course. I invited Wilfred Rubens and Erwin van Hunen to reflect and discuss with on my PLE (personal learning environment), the CCK09...

Read more

Podcast 1 (part 1): PLE and the impact of technology This podcast (part 1) was recorded as my final project for the CCK09 course. I invited Wilfred Rubens and Erwin van Hunen to reflect and discuss with me on PLE's (personal learning environments) and the...

Read more

Twitter & learners: love or hate?

Posted by Smetty | Posted in CCK09, Presentation | Posted on 21-12-2009

Tags: ,

0

I decided to give 2 presentations on connectivism, to finish up my CCK09 course. The first opportunity took place last weekend @Barcamp 3 Ghent. The presentation can be found on Slideshare.

My presentation starts with some observations out of my own classroom. I ask my own students every year (pre service teachers, professional bachelors, 3-years of study) if they think they can learn from and with others via Twitter, weblogs, podcasts, Facebook etc. And every year, I get the same type of answers for all the applications I mention, except for Facebook. I took Twitter as an example here, but it could be replaced with blogs or podcasts or…

CCK09 Concept map

Posted by Smetty | Posted in CCK09 | Posted on 06-12-2009

Tags: ,

0

My last task for the CCK09-course was finalizing my concept map (PDF-format).

CCK09 concept map

To be honest, I don’t like concept maps which are too big. That’s why I choose to concentrate on the topics that interested me the most in this course (or maybe: which I was ready for in my learning process).

Some words on the concept map:

  • As a Ph.D. student, I read almost every day articles on learning theories. So far, connectivism has not been mentioned in any of those articles. The CCK09 course was a good starting point in widening my view on learning theories.
  • Being a teacher myself, the course made me reflect on my own job. My second article, the end of the fishbowl, reflects my thoughts on this topic.
  • A third focus for me was my own learning process, where I did a lot of thinking on learning in networks and the personal learning environment. I discussed my view and questions on this topics in podcast one part 1 and part 2.
  • And finally, I learned a lot about (and did a lot of thinking on) the impact of technology and authority on learning and teaching.

The concept map was made with Cmap. I consider the concept map to be a snapshot in time.

Podcast 1 (part 2): my PLE and the influence of the CCK09 course

Posted by Smetty | Posted in CCK09, Podcast | Posted on 30-11-2009

Tags: ,

3

This podcast (part 2) was recorded as my final project for the CCK09 course. I invited Wilfred Rubens and Erwin van Hunen to reflect and discuss with on my PLE (personal learning environment), the CCK09 course and the difference between a LMS and a PLE.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Shownotes:

  • Analyzing Cindy’s PLE (0:00 – 11:00)
  • The influence of the CCK09 course (11:00 – 20:15)
  • the difference between a LMS and a PLE (20:15 – 25:10)

About the panel:

Wilfred Rubens (1964) currently works as a policy advisor at an institute for vocational education and training (ICT in education, educational development and innovation). Furthermore Wilfred provides keynotes, presentations, workshops and classes about technology enhanced learning. He is professionally involved in e-learning for more than 12 years. For more than 5 years he blogs about ICT and learning and can also be found on Twitter and various other software tools.

Erwin van Hunen works as a senior technical architect and competence manager for an IT company in Stockholm. He’s also the creator of various Doppler versions (Windows podcast aggregator and RSS reader on iPhone platform) and blogs on the Mobile Viking weblog.

Your host is Dr. Smetty.

Podcast 1 (part 1): PLE and the impact of technology

Posted by Smetty | Posted in CCK09, Podcast | Posted on 30-11-2009

Tags: ,

3

This podcast (part 1) was recorded as my final project for the CCK09 course. I invited Wilfred Rubens and Erwin van Hunen to reflect and discuss with me on PLE’s (personal learning environments) and the impact of technology on our learning.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Shownotes:

  • Introduction (0:00 – 2:00)
  • PLE Erwin (2:00 – 3:15)
  • PLE Wilfred (3:15 – 4:15)
  • PLE close-up Wilfred (4:15 – 7:15)
  • PLE close-up Erwin (7:15 – 8:45)
  • Conclusion (8:45 – 9:45)
  • PLE Cindy (9:45 – 13:45)
  • Impact of technology on learning Erwin (13:45 – 16:30)
  • Impact of technology on learning Wilfred (16:30 – 20:20)

About the panel:

Wilfred Rubens (1964) currently works as a policy advisor at an institute for vocational education and training (ICT in education, educational development and innovation). Furthermore Wilfred provides keynotes, presentations, workshops and classes about technology enhanced learning. He is professionally involved in e-learning for more than 12 years. For more than 5 years he blogs about ICT and learning and can also be found on Twitter and various other software tools.

Erwin van Hunen works as a senior technical architect and competence manager for an IT company in Stockholm. He’s also the creator of various Doppler versions (Windows podcast aggregator and RSS reader on iPhone platform) and blogs on the Mobile Viking weblog.

Your host is Dr. Smetty.

The end of the fishbowl

Posted by Smetty | Posted in CCK09 | Posted on 22-11-2009

Tags: ,

1

In this second paper, I will try to find an answer to the question if the roles as educators (ICT and media teacher at the faculty of Teacher Training Hogeschool Gent) within my field are changing by reflecting on my own position. I want to state clearly that the views and opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of the organizations I am related with (Full version, PDF-format, including references).

Introduction

I want to start this paper with a reflection on my first year as a teacher trainer. Being a newbie, I was really happy I could teach in parallel with a colleague. He provided me with support, content and the learning materials. At that time, ICT and media was almost completely understood as teaching Microsoft Office Programs. All courses were given ex-cathedra, and in a one-way-communication style with the teacher in front and students who were trying to follow the instructions demonstrated on their desktop computers. One day in that first year, I was explaining them how to work with styles in Microsoft Word. I remember looking at their faces at one point. Right there, I had the feeling to be in front of a fishbowl with goldfishes. They were gasping at me, just opening their mouth to breathe air. I will never forget that moment, because it was the first step in my belief I had to change my role as an educator.

My position on connectivism

Posted by Smetty | Posted in CCK09 | Posted on 25-10-2009

Tags: ,

1

My view on connectivism and my position towards it still changes every day, as I keep on discovering new and interesting ideas. This paper represents only a short moment in time and is not a definitive statement (Full version, PDF-format, including references).

What is connectivism?

“Connectivism is the application of network principles to define both knowledge and the process of learning. Knowledge is defined as a particular pattern of relationships and learning is defined as the creation of new connections and patterns as well as the ability to manoeuvre around existing networks/patterns”(Siemens, 2008).

Siemens (2009) suggests that in order to understand learning we need to understand how and why connections are formed. He further states that “connections are formed at various levels: neural, cognitive/conceptual, and social”.

I do not want to talk about connectivism in a physical or biological sense, as I do not feel comfortable enough with the subject to do so. But I do have some thoughts on the conceptual and social level.

I would like to discuss the important role of technology and connections, networks and organisations (context) in our daily lives. These two components alone justify considering connectivism as a new starting point. It is clear that many more factors could be taken into consideration, but that would bring me too far from the scope of this assignment. I will also address three outstanding questions concerning connectivism.

Technology

Technology is one of those important trends, if not the most important one, that brings up new challenges in society. Educators encounter how technology is changing our knowledge and the way we learn. This also results in the way we (should) teach. For example: is it still important that we learn our children useless figures and facts that can be Googled in a few seconds? Or is it more important to learn our children how they can find trustworthy information and interpret this?

Technology not only changes the way we act on knowledge, but also how we interact with others. Not so long ago interaction was geographically limited. Knowledge was transferred from the teacher in front of the class to the students, from parents to their children etc. Today the world is a global village. Forming social connections can not be considered something new, but the internet gives us the possibility to form connections just anytime, anywhere and with anyone. Especially the internet with its Web2.0 and social tools, and the semantic evolutions with regard to search engines, help us to connect and learn in total different ways.

Context

Another aspect in favour of connectivism is the place where learning occurs. “A central tenet of most learning theories is that learning occurs inside a person… These theories do not address learning that occurs outside of people (i.e. learning that is stored and manipulated by technology). They also fail to describe how learning happens within organizations” (Siemens, 2004).
Knowledge is not restricted anymore and in possession of the happy few. Knowledge is out there, on the net and in our network. Learning should not be viewed as a linear process between persons, but as a process of forming and handling infinite connections. “Chaos is the new reality (Siemens 2004)”.

Online course (CCK09): connectivism & connective knowledge

Posted by Smetty | Posted in CCK09 | Posted on 24-09-2009

Tags: ,

0

I enrolled to an online open course, connectivism & connective knowledge, organized by the University of Manitoba. The instructors are George Siemens and Stephen Downes. A couple of hundred participants follow the course, 20 of them will make assignments for credit. I do not mind saying I am one of them. In order to get my Ph.D., I need credits because of our doctoral schools program. So if you see posts tagged CCK09, that means they are part of my reflections on the course. The course started last week, but the flu got me from starting on time. But here we go.

The first topic last week was quite an important and theoretical one: what is connectivism? A nice starting point is definitely the table created by George Siemens on how connectivism and the other learning theories match (or differ).

After exploring the Moodle course and the readings and resources for week 1, I ended up writing down 3 questions which look very interesting to me (I expect people to ask those questions when I talk about the course).

  • Is connectivism really different from constructivism?
  • How new is connectivism?
  • Is connectivism applicable in my own educational practice?

I do not know the answers yet, and I am not sure if I will find them, but I surely will search for them.